• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational And Defy Human Logic: Punjab & Haryana HC

Latest Articles

Back

NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational And Defy Human Logic: Punjab & Haryana HC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  31 Aug 2018     Views:3211

Let me begin at the very beginning by first and foremost pointing out that in a landmark judgment with far reaching consequences while deciding a bail application in a drug trafficking case titled Ankush Kumar @ Sonu vs State of Punjab CRM-M-30643 of 2018 (O&M) decided on 9 August 2018, Justice Rajbir Sehrawat of Punjab and Haryana High Court took the unprecedented step of venturing an in-depth analysis of constitutionality of the provisions of NDPS  Act, which puts several arbitrary conditions on grant of bail. It was pointed out that, “On mere opposition by the Public Prosecutor, to the grant of bail to the accused, this Section casts a duty upon the Court to satisfy itself that there are reasonable grounds for believing: (A) that he is not guilty of such offence; (B) that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail. The entire controversy in this case, is regarding the above-said two conditions.” Though the Judge did not hold that the provision is unconstitutional, as he was only considering a bail application, he made several observations in the judgment to the effect that it is discriminatory, irrational and defy human logic which certainly cannot be lightly dismissed!

                   Bail under NDPS

                                  To be sure, the bail provision under Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act as contained in Section 37 reads as: “No person accused of an offence punishable for offences involving commercial quantity shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless (i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for such release, and (ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail.”

                                     Needless to say, it was observed by Justice Rajbir Sehrawat that, “Under Indian Constitution as well, the persons/citizens have been given certain rights which are fundamental to the human existence. Out of those, right to life and liberty guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution of India is one such right, which is considered to be of such immense importance that it cannot be suspended even for the sake of or under the other provisions of the Constitution itself still effort is made by the State to regulate even this right of the individual citizen, in the name of the ‘interest of society’ or the existence of the State. One such aspect of such Regulation of right of the individual to life and liberty is; providing for the person alleged to have committed an offence to be kept in custody; and the prohibitive conditions for release on bail. Hence, there has been continuous debate on the right of individual not to be kept in custody during pendency of the trial and the privilege of the State to keep him in custody and to prescribe rigorous conditions for his release on bail, if at all he can be. The present case also involves the same struggle between the individual’s right to life and liberty and the might of the State as reflected in the conditions prescribed under Section 37 of Narcotic and Psychotropic Substances Act for release on bail.”  

                         Background

                               Before proceeding ahead, let us first and foremost understand the background and facts of this present case as explained in the initial part of the judgment itself. The facts of the present case are that the FIR No. 35 dated 22.03.2017 was registered under Section 22 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act at Police Station Kartarpur, Jalandhar (Punjab). The allegation as contained in the FIR against the petitioner was that on 22.03.2017, ASI Gurnam Singh of Police Station Kartarpur, Jalandhar, along with other police officials was present at Bholath Road; near Maliyan Turning of the road; in the area of Kartarpur; in connection with patrol duty and checking for the bad elements. Then the petitioner was allegedly seen by the police party coming from the side of Maliyan; on foot. On seeing the police party, the petitioner tried to turn back. This led the Police to have suspicion upon the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner was apprehended by the Police Party. On being apprehended, the petitioner was told that the above said ASI suspected that the petitioner was carrying some intoxicating substance and that he was required to be searched. Therefore, the petitioner was allegedly, given an option whether he wanted to be searched in presence of some gazette officer or a Magistrate. The petitioner is alleged to have reposed faith in the above said ASI Gurnam Singh and expressed no objection to his search by the Police Party present on the spot. The Police, allegedly, made effort to join some independent person in the process but none came forward. Therefore, the search of the person of the petitioner was conducted by the said ASI Gurnam Singh. During the search, a plastic container containing 300 grams of intoxicating powder was allegedly recovered from the back pocket of pant/lower worn by the petitioner. The same was sealed into parcel and taken into possession. Accordingly, the above said FIR was registered on the basis of writing sent to the Police Station by the abovesaid ASI Gurnam Singh. As per the allegations, the sample of the seized material was sent to Chemical Examiner and as per the report of the Chemical Examiner, Alprazolam was found in the sample. Accordingly, the petitioner was kept in custody.

                                   In a strong rebuttal of the police version, the petitioner has asserted that he is a law abiding citizen and that he has been roped in a false case, to increase the statistics of the Police; during the special drive launched against the Narcotics. In fact, there was no recovery from the petitioner nor was he arrested from the spot, as claimed by the Police. The petitioner was picked up by the Police from his locality on 19.03.2017 from near the place of worship of Peer Di Jagah; in the presence of his brother Lalit Kumar and he was brought to the Police Station and illegally detained there. Subsequently, the petitioner was involved in the present false case by the Police.

                                  Be it noted, the petitioner had filed an application for releasing him on bail pending trial before the Special Judge, Jalandhar. However, the Court of Special Judge, Jalandhar dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner by observing that the petitioner was found in conscious possession of 300 grams of intoxicating powder. Hence, in view of the rigour of Section 37 of NDPS Act, he was hold to be not entitled to the bail. However, a perusal of the order passed by the Special Judge shows that the Special Judge has adverted to only the condition mentioned in Section 37(1)(b)(ii), in so far as it has expressed itself, to say that the petitioner was found in conscious possession of the intoxicating material. However, as further required under Section 37(1)(b)(ii), the Special Court has not recorded its satisfaction for believing whether the petitioner is likely to commit any offence or not while on bail. However, recording of this satisfaction by the Special Court may not be necessary because the Special Court has not released the petitioner on bail, rather it has dismissed the bail application filed by the petitioner.

                               Of course, feeling dissatisfied with the order passed by the Special Court and to secure his liberty, the petitioner has preferred the present application under Section 439 CrPC for grant of bail, pending trial in the above said case.

 
                     The Contentions

                                        As it turned out, while arguing the bail applications, the counsel for the accused made a submission before the Bench that any other citizen, the accused is also entitled to be considered for grant of bail under more liberal provisions of Section 439 of CrPC. It was further contended that applying strict provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act is a discrimination with him. Relying on recent judgment of the Supreme Court in  Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs Union of India and another, it was contended that a similar provision as contained in Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 has been held to be unconstitutional by holding that the importance of the ‘object’ of the Act cannot be made a ground to trample the right of life and liberty guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

                                  While arguing the case, the learned counsel for the petitioner has repeated the arguments mentioned above; to the effect that the petitioner was picked up by the Police three days in advance and he was framed in a false case. It was further pleaded that the petitioner is not involved in this case at all. The recovery against the petitioner has been concocted by the Police. The Police have not followed the procedure prescribed under Section 50 of NDPS Act, as required by the law as laid down by the Courts in several judgments. No Magistrate or gazetted Officer was actually called on the spot, nor is even shown to have been so called by the Police. No independent witness is joined by the Police at the time of search. Therefore, the safeguard provided for by the Act; under Section 51 of the Act; has also been disregarded by the Police. All these violations have been committed by the Police for the simple reason that had the Police complied with these provisions, the Police would not have been able to frame the petitioner in this false case. It is further contended by the counsel for the petitioner that earlier also, the petitioner was involved in a false case. However, in that case, the petitioner was acquitted by the Special Court; vide its judgment dated 05.04.2017. In fact, the petitioner has never indulged in dealing with the Narcotics at all. Counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.03.2017 and despite passage of about one and half years, the prosecution has examined only three witnesses. So, the trial is likely to take a long time. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail pending trial.


Discriminatory In View Of Nikesh Tarachand Shah Ratio

                                    Simply put, on the contention based on Supreme Court judgment in Nikesh Tarachand Shah, the Court observed that in the said case, one of the grounds for holding the provision of Section 45 of Money Laundering Act, 2002 as unconstitutional was that there was no prohibition in the Money Laundering Act for grant of anticipatory bail. It was observed in the said case that a person could be granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC without adverting to the conditions prescribed under Section 45 of Money Laundering Act and he can continue on bail without the Court recording its satisfaction qua the conditions prescribed under Section 45 of the Money Laundering Act.

                                          It cannot be lost on us that the Court said quite clearly and convincingly that, “However, if a person is somehow arrested then he cannot be released on bail except after recording of the satisfaction by the Court as to the conditions specified in Section 45 of the Money Laundering Act. Therefore, the conditions prescribed under Section 45 of the Money Laundering Act were held to be discriminatory and arbitrary. In the present case also, there is no prohibition under NDPS Act for grant of anticipatory bail.”

                                    Going forward, the Court further said that, “Therefore, a person can get the anticipatory bail irrespective of compliance or consideration of conditions prescribed under Section 37(i)(b)(ii), whereas, if a person is arrested, he cannot be granted bail unless the Court records its satisfaction as to the conditions prescribed under the above said clause of Section 37 of NDPS Act. This can also lead to a thoroughly absurd situation, taking for example, the case of a person who, at initial stage, is just named as an accomplice in a case under the NDPSA Act, without there being anything else against him in the FIR; but his co-accused being arrested with commercial quantity.  

            No Court can record a satisfaction and belief about guilt of an accused at the stage of grant of bail

                                    As things stood, the Court observed that the mandatory requirement of the satisfaction of the Court, at the stage of grant of bail, qua the petitioner not being guilty of such an offence militates against the presumption of the innocence of the accused till he is proved guilty. It said plainly that, “This language also creates an inconsistency in itself, because if a Court granting bail records a satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the petitioner is ‘not guilty’ of such an offence then this may, at least to some extent, foreclose the option of the trial Court for holding that the petitioner ‘is guilty’ of such an offence although this may or may not be the intention of the legislature, as observed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. But the language of Section 37(1)(b)(ii) says so in so many words. As per this language, the “reasonableness” is required only qua existence of grounds for belief of Court but the belief of the Court, as such qua the accused being not guilty is to be unqualified. No Court can record a satisfaction and belief that a person is ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ of the offence at the stage of grant of bail. What is required to be done after a full fledged trial of an accused cannot be sought to be considered and recorded at the initial stage of trial.”   

                Uncontrolled, undefined and unlimited discretion of the Public Prosecutor impinging upon the power of the Court to freely decide the question of bail

                                          More importantly, the Court noted that Section 37(1)(b)(ii) makes the application of the conditions mentioned in this provision to be applicable only if the Public Prosecutor so desires. It observed scathingly that, “As per the language of this Section where the Public Prosecutor does not oppose the bail application then Court is not required to apply its mind for arriving at a satisfaction and belief as prescribed in Section 37(1)(b)(ii), despite the fact that the quantity of contraband involved may be many times more than the commercial quantity. So the application of the conditions mentioned in Section 37(1)(b)(ii) becomes the dependant upon the uncontrolled, undefined and unlimited discretion of the Public Prosecutor. This discretion of Public Prosecutor, besides, impinging upon the power of the Court to freely decide the question of bail to the accused, renders the entire process as liable to be discriminatory and un-informed, because Court cannot ensure that the Public Prosecutor has the necessary expertise or sincerity to the cause to take a proper decision, as to taking objection qua bail to the accused.”

        Granting bail would tantamount to quashing charge

                                    Truth be told, another interesting dichotomy that was illustrated by the Court points out that, “While granting bail as per provisions of Section 37(1)(b)(ii), the Court would be required to record, at least, the prima facie, or more than prima facie, satisfaction that the accused is not guilty of the offence alleged against him. And this satisfaction has to be recorded by the Court with reference to the material on record. Whereas at the stage of framing of charge on the basis of same material and record, the Court is to arrive at a prima-facie satisfaction that such a person has committed such offence. In that situation, the accused would be entitled to get the charge quashed, moment he is granted bail by recording satisfaction of the Court as required under Section 37(1)(b)(ii). The accused as a person having protection of legal justness, fairness and rationality can very well put a poser to the Court as to how the Court is restricting its satisfaction to purpose of bail only; despite the satisfaction and belief of the Court being based on the same record and the same being reasonable, and in a given case; even the Court being the same.”

     Humanly impossible for the court to arrive at reasonable satisfaction qua possible future conduct and mental state of an accused

                                        In essence, the Court found fault with the provision which requires the Court to be satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for declaring that the accused is not likely to commit ‘any offence’ while on bail. The Judge rationally observed that, “Moreover, a Court of law would always be well advised to keep in mind that ‘prophesy is not thy domain’. No Court, howsoever trained, can be “reasonably” satisfied that a person would not commit any offence, maybe even under NDPS Act, after coming out of the custody. It can only be a guess-work, which may or may not turn out to be correct. However, it is not the guess-work which is mandated, but it is “reasonable satisfaction”.

                               Truly speaking, it was further observed that, “By extension of any human logic, it cannot be said that the Court can record, any degree of satisfaction, based on some reasonable ground, as to whether a person would commit an offence or whether he would not commit an offence after coming out of the custody. Neither the Court would be able to record a satisfaction that the accused would, likely, commit the offence after coming out of the custody, nor would the Court be able to record a satisfaction that the accused would not commit any offence after coming out of the custody. Hence, the second part of Section 37(i)(b)(ii) requires a humanly impossible act on the part of the court. Since the second part of Section 37 (1)(b)(ii) requires a satisfaction of the Court, which is impossible by extension of any human logic, therefore, this is an irrational requirement. There is no rational way for a Court to record its satisfaction or to arrive at this satisfaction qua possible future conduct and mental state of an accused. Any record relating only to the past conduct of a person cannot be reasonably made a basis for future reasonable prediction, as against the guess work, regarding the possible mental state or possible conduct of that person. Even the sophisticated statistical tools of factorization, based on common minimum behavioural factors in large number of people, are still struggling to find a credible answer in this regard.”

                                         Not stopping here, the Court further observed that, “Though it has been held in various judgments that unless the Court so applies its mind and arrive at a satisfaction qua the conditions prescribed by Section, the Court cannot grant bail to an accused, but in none of the judgments, any adequate determining principles have been spelled out for the Court to be guided with, in exercise of such a power qua further possible events. In fact, there can be none, if the Court is to record this satisfaction in a ‘reasonable’ manner and on the basis of the ‘available record’ only; and it is not to delve into a pure guess-work. And if the adequate determining principles are not prescribed or decipherable under that Act or cannot be gathered even by human logic then such a procedure has to be treated to be an irrational, undue and unfair procedure for the purpose of inviolability of the right to life and liberty of an individual.”    

           Past conduct of a person cannot be reasonably made a basis for future reasonable prediction

                                   In hindsight, the Punjab and Haryana High Court also very rightly said that any record relating only to the past conduct of a person cannot be reasonably made a basis for future reasonable prediction, as against the guesswork, regarding the possible mental state or possible conduct of that person. It unerringly held that, “It can occur to mind that if a person is a first offender then he is not likely to commit an offence again or that if a person has committed, say; ten offences then he is more likely to commit offence again. But it has to be kept in mind that the second, third, fourth and the Nth offence is always committed by an accused only after first, having committed the first offence. Likewise, there cannot be any ‘reason’ and, therefore, the ‘reasonable ground’ to believe that if a person has committed ten offences; he is again likely to commit the offence. Examples galore in daily life when a criminal calls it a day, say, after 10th crime also. After all scriptures do tell us as to how Balmiki turned into a “Maharishi” and created that Epic, which became a treatise of one of the biggest religion of the world.”

                              Bail Granted

                         All said and done, after considering all the facts of the case, the Judge observed that there are reasons to come, to a prima-facie, but reasonable satisfaction that the accused is not involved in the crime alleged in the present case. Granting bail to the accused, the Punjab and Haryana High Court observed that, “But, so far as second part of Section 37(1)(b)(ii), i.e. regarding the satisfaction of the Court based on reasons to believe that the accused would not commit ‘any offence’ after coming out of the custody, is concerned, this Court finds that this is the requirement which is being insisted by the State, despite the same being irrational and being incomprehensible from any material on record. As held above, this Court cannot go into the future mental state of the mind of the petitioner as to what he would be, likely, doing after getting released on bail. Therefore, if this Court cannot record a reasonable satisfaction that the petitioner is not likely to commit ‘any offence’ or ‘offence under NDPS Act’ after being released on bail, then this Court, also, does not have any reasonable ground to be satisfied that the petitioner is likely to commit any offence after he is released on bail. Hence, the satisfaction of the Court in this regard is neutral qua future possible conduct of the petitioner. However, it has come on record that earlier also, the petitioner was involved in a case, but he has been acquitted in that case. So his antecedents are also clear as of now. Moreover, since this Court has already recorded a prima-facie satisfaction that petitioner is not involved even in the present case and that earlier also the petitioner was involved in a false case, then this Court can, to some extent, venture to believe that the petitioner would not, in all likelihood, commit any offence after coming out of the custody, if at all, the Court is permitted any liberty to indulge in prophesy.” Therefore, the petitioner was ordered to be released on bail during trial.   


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  31 Aug 2018     Views:3211

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:1071
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:924
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:1101
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:991
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1567
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:1013
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4457
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5300
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5560
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5651
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5751
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:10211
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:5171
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5453
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5875
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5690
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2989
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2587
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2203
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:5109
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21531
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8331
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4699
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4246
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8979
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:4047
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3826
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4918
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3664
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1936
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2738
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2277
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1964
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56476
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1866
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2002
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2190
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2144
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6463
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1632
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1644
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1730
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:31578
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6442
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3255
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6016
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10844
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3441
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2815
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7863
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:55006
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1931
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1517
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1811
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1961
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1757
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3504
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1508
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6466
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1908
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2216
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1887
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3491
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12547
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1792
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1903
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3372
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4703
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2476
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10818
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1599
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6406
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2400
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2438
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2755
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26205
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4989
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1807
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33659
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1801
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6801
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1833
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3878
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1791
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2979
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19958
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1688
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1663
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1547
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1959
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2352
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1981
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1523
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1482
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1413
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1469
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:7176
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1850
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1692
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1416
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1772
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1931
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1573
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1428
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1483
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1901
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1776
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1474
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1627
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:9094
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1902
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1608
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1589
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1592
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:10193
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1675
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1509
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1521
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1720
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3465
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1435
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1467
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1804
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2585
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1871
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2015
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2151
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1574
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2858
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1685
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2219
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1510
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1768
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1785
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1770
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1613
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1491
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2857
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6294
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:4020
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1982
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2215
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2251
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2154
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2232
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2748
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2164
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2109
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2743
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2308
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5206
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5973
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2335
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2436
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:2064
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2359
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2912
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35628
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4265
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:2009
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:2026
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:2093
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2732
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1754
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1785
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:2103
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3504
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2352
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4214
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2160
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2439
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1850
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1873
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1810
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1684
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1457
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1589
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2437
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1496
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1746
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1495
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1729
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1418
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4867
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:5054
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2542
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1589
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1713
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:5135
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4722
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2438
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2379
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2290
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1714
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1568
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2111
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1603
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2166
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1809
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1712
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1713
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1531
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1640
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1644
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1595
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1743
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1573
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1823
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1587
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1572
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1520
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2243
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1687
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1600
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1599
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2025
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1926
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1442
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:3071
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1871
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1784
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1570
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1643
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1825
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1752
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1820
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1780
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:2008
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1577
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1857
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1775
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1838
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1563
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1483
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2152
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1894
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2155
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1659
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1532
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1578
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5838
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2412
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1593
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1622
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1863
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1555
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1582
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1491
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1872
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:2028
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1515
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1639
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1402
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:2107
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1440
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1646
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2501
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2839
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2838
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2972
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1441
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1744
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:5191
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2829
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1973
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2321
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5792
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1727
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:9156
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips...
20 May 2019     Views:1588
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1816
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1526
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3265
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1608
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1463
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3610
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4469
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:8463
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6863
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1880
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1658
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2213
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2369
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2448
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2475
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1510
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1971
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2661
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3197
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2931
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3236
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1640
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1725
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3346
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2660
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3318
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2541
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2768
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2867
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2113
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2241
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2296
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2899
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1818
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1685
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1580
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6825
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1716
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1906
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12123
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3923
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1660
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2649
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2360
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2750
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3336
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1940
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2460
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:2093
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2377
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2516
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2567
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2423
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4695
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1677
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1785
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1642
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1585
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3263
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2041
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2815
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2611
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3889
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2933
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1818
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2917
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2064
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1838
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2373
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2197
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2515
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3333
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4265
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2565
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1854
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1939
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1858
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:2046
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2386
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3211
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1944
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving ...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2412
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2213
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1875
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2038
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2038
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2175
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2217
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2193
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2502
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2487
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1964
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:2078
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1941
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3323
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3302
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3155
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2437
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1767
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1718
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2273
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2252
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2014
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4858
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3453
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2741
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2335
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1722
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1598
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1783
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1604
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2781
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2198
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2607
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3209
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2317
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2374
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1906
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1651
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1815
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3646
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1648
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3080
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1576
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1959
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1838
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2020
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2206
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2024
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1733
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1865
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1643
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1589
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1727
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2229
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1756
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1660
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:3092
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1660
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1907
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1656
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1670
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2238
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1763
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1783
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1810
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2369
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2198
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1851
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1606
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1645
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2126
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2285
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1600
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1844
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1703
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2646
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1786
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2645
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1721
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2192
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2467
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1853
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1897

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56476
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:55006
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35628
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33659
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:31578
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.