• Sign In/Sign Up
  • Menu
  • +Clients Back

    • Get Free Legal Answers
    • Get Fee Estimates
    • Find Lawyers
  • +Lawyers

    • Case Diary & Office Manager
    • Post News & Artilces
    • Post Jobs & Internships
  • +Law Students

    • Campus Ambassadors
    • Find Jobs & Internships
    • Post News & Articles
    • Resource Sharing
  • +Law Schools

    • Post Admissions
    • Post Opportunities
    • Get Law School Rating

  • Home
  • Post Articles
  • Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability Of Complicity Of A Person Required: SC

Latest Articles

Back

Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 CrPC Stronger Evidence Than Mere Probability Of Complicity Of A Person Required: SC

Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Apr 2019     Views:6520

It would be imperative to mention right at the outset that in a significant pronouncement, the Supreme Court just recently on March 15, 2019 in Sugreev Kumar v. State of Punjab & Ors in Criminal Appeal No. 509 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (Cri.) No. 9687 of 2018  has unequivocally reiterated that to add a person as additional accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, stronger evidence is required than mere probability of complicity of that person. This notable and commendable judgment authored by Justice Dinesh Maheshwari for himself and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre while setting aside an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court unambiguously observed that while invoking Section 319 CrPC should not proceed as if an infallible case is required to be shown by the prosecution in order to proceed against the proposed accused persons. Very rightly so!

                                         While leave is granted in para 1, we then see that para 2 brings out that, “In this appeal, the complainant-appellant has called in question the judgment and order dated 02.07.2018 in Criminal Revision Application No. 2626 of 2014 whereby, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, has upheld the order dated 24.07.2014 as passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fazilka in S.C. No. 9 of 14.01.2014 on an application filed under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (‘crPC’) seeking summoning of additional accused persons to stand the trial.”

                                    As things stand, para 2.1 then brings out that, “The sessions case aforesaid is pending trial for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 341, 34 of the Indian Penal Code (‘IPC’) and Sections 25, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act. By the said order dated 24.07.2014 on the application under Section 319 CrPC, the Trial Court, while partly granting the prayer of the prosecution to summon one of the accused Sonu son of Jaipal to face the trial, has dismissed the prayer for summoning the other 7 persons namely, Krishan Dev, Vikash son of Krishan Dev, Rajan, Mukesh @ Jungli, Devinder @ Veeru, Surinder Mahal and Prithvi Raj.”

                                      In hindsight, it is then observed in para 3 that, “The background aspects, so far relevant for the present purpose, could be noticed, in brief, as follows:

3.1 The prosecution case is that on 29.08.2013, the appellant accompanied by his father, brother and other associates, proceeded to reclaim possession of their land from the erstwhile tenants in compliance with the directions issued by the Court of Assistant Collector Grade-1, than on reaching the site at about 3:30 p.m., they found that the concerned revenue officers were not present and while they were making their way back to the village in search of the revenue officers, 3-4 cars intercepted them and about 10-12 persons emerged from the said vehicles, some of them being the alleged tenants, who were armed with pistols, rifles, swords, dangs, sotas and 12 bore gun; and that after a heated exchange of words, the appellant, his family members and their associates were attacked by the accused which resulted in the demise of the appellant’s father and brother while the others sustained varying injuries with the appellant receiving three bullet injuries.

3.2 For the incident in question, FIR came to be filed against 11 persons for the offences under Sections 302, 307, 341, 148 and 149 IPC as also Sections 27, 54 and 59 of the Arms Act. However, after investigation, only 3 persons, namely, Vikram Gilla, Gurmit Singh and Sunil Kumar, were charge-sheeted.

3.3 In trial, the appellant was examined by the prosecution as PW-1, who asserted in relation to the incident in question, inter alia, as under:-

       “…… After alighting from the car Vikas raised Alarm that they be taught lesson for taking possession of their land. Then Vikram fired from his rifle on my father which hit him. Then my brother Sandeep alighted from the Jeep and Vikram with his rifle fired two shots at him which hit on the left side of his chest and waist. Krishan again raised Lalkara and instigated Sonu why are you standing and asked him to kill all sons of Hanuman. Then Sonu fired three shots from, his revolver out of which two fires on my chest near the heart and one near the left shoulder. Vikram again fired shot from his gun on my father which hit him on his waist. Then allthe accused started indiscriminating firing with their revolver, 12 bore gun and pistols and the fires hit with the vehicles. Mahi Ram, Budh Ram, my father and Sham Lal our servant. Thereafter we raised Raula of MAR DITTA MAR DITTA. Then accused tried to run away on their vehicles but Innova did not start and they left the Innova then along with 12 bore rifle and ran away from the spot in another vehicles….(sic)”

3.4 In his cross-examination, the appellant deposed that Krishan Dev, Vikas, Sonu, Rajan, Mukesh @ Jungli, Devinder @ Veeru, Surinder Mahal and Pirthi Raj were declared innocent after investigation by the police, but volunteered to state that they were wrongly declared innocent.

3.5 Pending further cross-examination of the appellant, an application under Section 319 CrPC was filed by the prosecution to summon the aforesaid 8 persons to face trial on the basis of the testimony of the appellant (PW-1), wherein, he had asserted that all of them were present at the crime scene; and had assaulted and injured the applicant, his family members and associates on exhortation by Krishan Dev which resulted in the demise of his father and brother. Hence, it was submitted that there was sufficient material on record to summon all the aforesaid persons to face the trial in this case.”

                                       To be sure, it is then pointed out in para 4 that, “In its impugned order dated 24.07.2014, the Trial Court referred to certain inconsistencies in the testimony of the appellant as compared to his statement under Section 161 CrPC and the FIR; and found no case for summoning 7 of the aforesaid persons but considered it just and proper to summon Sonu son of Jaipal, who had allegedly fired three shots from his firearm, which hit the appellant.”

                              As it turned out, it is then disclosed in para 5 that, “Against the order aforesaid, the appellant filed a criminal revision petition, being CRR No. 2626 of 2014, before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh which was dismissed by the impugned order dated 02.07.2018. It is mentioned in paragraph 4 of the order impugned that the learned counsel for the petitioner had confined the relief only qua the respondent Nos. 2 and 3, Krishan Dev and Vikas son of Krishan Dev. The High Court upheld the order of the Trial Court while observing as under:

           “11. In this case, statements of complainant and witnesses is same, which were recorded by the police during investigation. Learned trial Court has observed in its order that Vikas was attributed lalkara to the effect that complainant party be taught lesson for taking possession of the disputed land while Sugreev (PW) had admitted in his cross-examination that possession of the disputed land had not yet been taken by them. This shows that respondents, Krishna Dev and Vikas were arrayed as accused because of enmity between the parties and the police during investigation had collected the evidence which prove that both these respondents were far away from the place of occurrence.

         12. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Brijendra Singh (supra) has observed that for summoning the additional accused under Section 319 Cr.P.C. degree of satisfaction is much stricter. Power under Section 319 Cr.P.C. is discretionary and extraordinary power which is to be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where circumstances of the case so warrants and strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence led before the Court and not in a casual and cavalier manner. …….”

                                   As anticipated, para 6 then envisages that, “Assailing the order aforesaid, the learned counsel for the appellant has strenuously argued that the High Court as also the Trial Court have failed to consider the fact that respondent No. 2 Krishan Dev and respondent No. 3 Vikas are the main perpetrators of the crime; and had planned everything in advance for executing the crime and to escape from the law. Learned counsel would submit that the exhortation (lalkara) was a previously planned one as the possession of the land was to be handed over to the appellant and his family members; that the Innova car, which is registered in the name of respondent No. 2, was recovered from the scene of the crime; and that the report submitted by the police is based on the statement of witnesses at the instance of the respondents Nos. 2 and 3, where some of them are related to respondent No. 2 and while the others are his acquaintances. Learned counsel would submit that with the evidence available on record, a clear case for proceeding against the aforesaid persons alongwith the charge-sheeted accused is made out. Learned counsel for the appellant has referred to and relied upon the decisions in Hardeep Singh v. State of Punjab : (2014) 3 SCC 92 and Brijendra Singh & Ors. V. State of Rajasthan : (2017) 7 SCC 706.”

                                      On the contrary, it is then brought out in para 7 that, “Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents have duly supported the orders impugned and have submitted that no case for interference is made out as the Court under Section 319 of CrPC are to be exercised sparingly and, in this case, the Trial Court and the High Court, after having thoroughly examined the record, found no substance in the application so moved. More specifically, learned counsel for respondent No. 6 has pointed out that before the High Court, the appellant had given up the challenge qua this respondent. Learned counsel would submit that the impugned order has been passed after due consideration of the material on record; that his name was neither reflected in the FIR nor in the statement under Section 161 CrPC; that after police investigation, nothing incriminating was found against him and even the Trial Court has found no cogent evidence against him.”

                                       Furthermore, para 8 then stipulates that, “During the course of submissions, it has been pointed out that since after passing of the orders impugned, further evidence of the prosecution was recorded in the trial and thereafter another application under Section 319 CrPC was moved for summoning of the aforesaid 7 persons but the same was also rejected by the Trial Court on 28.09.2018. It has also been submitted that practically, the entire prosecution evidence in the matter is over.”

                                       To put it succinctly, the Bench then held in para 9 that, “Having given anxious consideration to the rival submissions and having examined the record with reference to the law applicable, we are clearly of the view that the disposal of applications moved in this matter under Section 319 CrPC cannot be approved; and in the given set of facts and circumstances, it appears just and proper that the Trial Court should re-examine the entire matter with reference to the principles applicable to the case, in order to take a decision afresh as to whether the persons above-named or any of them deserve to be tried together with the other accused persons.”

                                 While encapsulating the purpose behind Section 319 of CrPC, the Bench then underscores in para 10 that, “It remains trite that the provisions contained in Section 319 CrPC are to achieve the objective that the real culprit should not get away unpunished. By virtue of these provisions, the Court is empowered to proceed against any person not shown as an accused, if it appears from evidence that such person has committed any offence for which, he could be tried together with the other accused persons. In Hardeep Singh (supra), the Constitution Bench of this Court has explained the purpose behind this provision, inter alia, in the following:

        “12. Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure springs out of the doctrine judex damnatur cum nocens absolvitur (judge is condemned when guilty is acquitted) and this doctrine must be used as a beacon of light while explaining the ambit and the spirit underlying the enactment of Section 319 Code of Criminal Procedure.

          13. It is the duty of the court to do justice by punishing the real culprit. Where the investigation agency for any reason does not array one of the real culprits as an accused, the court is not powerless in calling the said accused to face trial. The question remains under what circumstances and at what stage should the court exercise its power as contemplated in Section 319 CrPC?  

***                     ***                      ***

              19. The court is the sole repository of justice and a duty is cast upon it to uphold the rule of law and, therefore, it will be inappropriate to deny the existence of such powers with the courts in our criminal justice system where it is not uncommon that the real accused, at times, get away by manipulating the investigating and/or the prosecuting agency. The desire to avoid trial is so strong that an accused makes efforts at times to get himself absolved even at the stage of investigation or inquiry even though he may be connected with the commission of the offence.”

                                     What’s more, it is then significantly laid down in para 11 that, “As regards the degree of satisfaction required for invoking the powers under Section 319 CrPC, the Constitution Bench has laid down the principles as follows:

        “95. At the time of taking cognizance, the court has to see whether a prima facie case is made out to proceed against the accused. Under Section 319 CrPC, though the test of prima facie case is the same, the degree of satisfaction that is required is much stricter. A two-Judge Bench of this Court in Vikas v. State of Rajasthan, held that on the objective satisfaction of the court a person may be “arrested” or “summoned”, as the circumstances of the case may require, if it appears from the evidence that any such person not being the accused has committed an offence for which such person could be tried together with the already arraigned accused persons.

***                 ***                ***

         105. Power under Section 319 CrPC is a discretionary and an extraordinary power. It is to be exercised sparingly and only in those cases where the circumstances of the case so warrant. It is not to be exercised because the Magistrate or the Sesssions Judge is of the opinion that some other person may also be guilty of committing that offence. Only where strong and cogent evidence occurs against a person from the evidence led before the court that such power should be exercised and not in a casual and cavalier manner.

         106. Thus, we hold that though only a prima facie case is to be established from the evidence led before the court, not necessarily tested on the anvil of cross-examination, it requires much stronger evidence than mere probability of his complicity. The test that has to be applied is one which is more than prima facie case as exercised at the time of framing of charge, but short of satisfaction to an extent that the evidence, if goes unrebutted, would lead to conviction in the absence of such satisfaction, the court should refrain from exercising power under Section 319 CrPC. InSection 319 CrPC the purpose of providing if “it appears from the evidence that any person not being the accused has committed any offence” is clear from the words “for which such person could be tried together with the accused.” The words used are not “for which such person could be convicted”. There is, therefore, no scope for the court acting under Section 319 CrPC to form any opinion as to the guilt of the accused”.”

                                     Simply put, is then noted in para 12 that, “Thus, the provisions contained in Section 319 CrPC sanction the summoning of any person on the basis of any relevant evidence as available on record. However, it being a discretionary power and an extraordinary one, is to be exercised sparingly and only when cogent evidence is available. The prima facie opinion which is to be formed for exercise of this power requires stronger evidence than mere probability of complicity of a person. The test to be applied is the one which is more than a prima facie case as examined at the time of framing charge but not of satisfaction to the extent that the evidence, if goes uncontroverted, would lead to the conviction of the accused.”

                                        It is a no-brainer that the Bench then held in para 13 that, “While applying the above-mentioned principles to the facts of the present case, we are of the view that the consideration of the application under Section 319 CrPC in the orders impugned had been as if the existence of a case beyond reasonable doubt was being examined against the proposed accused persons. In other words, the Trial Court and the High Court have proceeded as if an infallible case was required to be shown by the prosecution in order to proceed against the proposed accused persons. That had clearly been an erroneous approach towards the prayer for proceeding against a person with reference to the evidence available on record.”

                                      Be it noted, para 14 then states that, “The appellant (PW-1) has made the statement assigning specific roles to the proposed accused persons. At this stage of consideration of the application under Section 319 CrPC, of course, the Trial Court was to look at something more than a prima facie case but could not have gone to the extent of enquiring as to whether the matter would ultimately result in conviction of the proposed accused persons.” Para 15 then further states that, “The other application moved by the prosecution after leading of further evidence in the matter has been rejected by the Trial Court essentially with reference to the impugned orders dated 24.07.2014 and 02.07.2018, which are the subject matter of challenge in this appeal.”

                                     Suffice it to say, para 16 then sums up by saying that, “In the totality of the circumstances of this case, rather than dilating further on the evidence, suffice it would be to observe for the present purpose that the prayer of the prosecution for proceeding against other accused persons, having not been examined in the proper prospective and with due regard to the applicable principles, deserves to be restored for reconsideration of the Trial Court.”

                              Finally and perhaps most importantly, it is then held in the last para 17 that, “Accordingly, this appeal is allowed in part, to the extent and in the manner that the impugned orders are set aside and the applications made by the prosecution under Section 319 CrPC are restored for reconsideration of the Trial Court. In the interest of justice, it is made clear that we have not pronounced on the merits of the case either way and it would be expected of the Trial Court to reconsider the prayer of prosecution for proceeding against the proposed accused persons totally uninfluenced by any observation herein regarding facts of the case but with due regard to the evidence on record and to the law applicable.”

                          All said and done, it is a must read judgment which makes the position on Section 319 CrPC very clear. It specifies clearly and convincingly that a person can be added as an additional accused only when there is strong and cogent evidence and mere probability of complicity of that person is not enough to add him as accused. Thus now there is no unambiguity and no uncertainty left on this as to the test that has to be applied while considering an application to add a person as an additional accused for which the Apex Court Bench comprising of Justice Dinesh Maheshwari and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre have to be appreciated and applauded for delivering such a landmark and laudable judgment so elegantly!  


Courtesy/By: Sanjeev Sirohi  |  04 Apr 2019     Views:6520

Articles Updates

Supreme Court Greenlights Sub-Classification of SC...
20 Sep 2024     Views:588
Post-Merger Vision: HDFC Bank to Prioritize Profit...
01 Aug 2024     Views:689
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:874
Budget 2024-25: Major Takeaways and Financial Proj...
01 Aug 2024     Views:786
The Mandal Verdict: Indra Sawhney and Its Lasting ...
22 Jul 2024     Views:970
Supreme Court Emphasizes Direct and a Specific Ple...
22 Jul 2024     Views:815
Bail and Punishment Provisions of NDPS matters...
05 Apr 2023     Views:4223
The Legal Depth of Cryptocurrency....
14 May 2022     Views:5063
Have You Suffered Harm Due to a Cochlear Implant?...
13 May 2022     Views:5290
When is a Deposition Summary used?...
13 May 2022     Views:5362
Denied! 8 Most Common Reasons for Green Card Denia...
25 Feb 2022     Views:5516
International customary law – a study of the Ang...
20 Feb 2022     Views:9908
How to Have an Essay Written for Free?...
10 Feb 2022     Views:4973
How to maximise a law firm’s success with a virt...
28 Dec 2021     Views:5272
Helpful Math Website for Students - AssignMaths.co...
26 Nov 2021     Views:5684
The Upcoming Municipal Nominee Program of Canada...
29 Oct 2021     Views:5514
Assault with a Weapon: How To Get Your Charges Dro...
28 Oct 2021     Views:2827
Law School Personal Statement Tips for Winning Adm...
12 Oct 2021     Views:2460
Can an Employee on Maternity Leave be Terminated?...
05 Oct 2021     Views:2028
OLD STATUTES MAKING A COMEBACK AMID VIRUS OUTBREAK...
04 May 2020     Views:4925
ARTICLE 141: DOCTRINE OF PRECEDENT...
04 May 2020     Views:21299
Presumptions in Evidence Law...
04 May 2020     Views:8156
Unique use of Technology during covid-19 pandemic...
30 Apr 2020     Views:4543
45 days interim bail granted to under- trial priso...
29 Apr 2020     Views:4078
DOCTRINE OF RES GESTAE...
27 Apr 2020     Views:8768
Rights of the LGBTQI community- a long road ahead....
26 Apr 2020     Views:3880
Measures to protect women against domestic violenc...
26 Apr 2020     Views:3698
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)...
25 Apr 2020     Views:4736
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertificatio...
24 Apr 2020     Views:3506
Increase in Cyberbullying during COVID-19...
24 Apr 2020     Views:1837
DOCTRINE OF COLOURABLE LEGISLATIONS...
24 Apr 2020     Views:2620
Doctrine of lifting of corporate veil...
23 Apr 2020     Views:2176
Meaning of Legal Pluralism...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1836
Once a mortgage, always a mortgage...
23 Apr 2020     Views:56022
Euthanasia- Meaning and Legality in India...
23 Apr 2020     Views:1751
Judicial activism and Judicial restraint...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1891
Concept of Insider Trading under Investment Law...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2087
Need for Legal Awareness...
22 Apr 2020     Views:2036
Is Extradition a Legal Duty of State? ...
22 Apr 2020     Views:6270
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Traff...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1532
Why Dependence On Criminal Law Is Not The Solution...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1550
Uniform Civil code...
22 Apr 2020     Views:1635
VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER ...
20 Apr 2020     Views:30766
ABETMENT UNDER THE INDIAN PENAL CODE...
20 Apr 2020     Views:6312
Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 197...
20 Apr 2020     Views:3149
NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL - CRITICAL ANALYSIS...
20 Apr 2020     Views:5892
LAWS AGAINST ACID ATTACK IN INDIA...
20 Apr 2020     Views:10712
Concept of conciliation...
19 Apr 2020     Views:3328
White collar crimes in India...
19 Apr 2020     Views:2706
No Law To Make Whatsapp Group Admins Liable For Me...
19 Apr 2020     Views:7696
Relationship between International Law and Municip...
18 Apr 2020     Views:54724
International Labour Organization (ILO)...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1825
How is the Law arena affected by COVID-19?...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1432
Motor Vehicle Insurance Law...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1714
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) AND ITS IMPO...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1818
ENVIRONMENTAL GAINS OF THE LOCKDOWN MUST BE PRESER...
18 Apr 2020     Views:1658
Difference between Kidnapping and Abduction...
17 Apr 2020     Views:3392
JUSTIFYING SC ORDER THAT MANDATES FREE COVID-19 TE...
17 Apr 2020     Views:1426
Evolution of the Nature and Scope of Article 12 of...
16 Apr 2020     Views:6297
Corruption laws in India ...
16 Apr 2020     Views:1808
ADVERTISING LAWS IN INDIA...
16 Apr 2020     Views:2084
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons...
15 Apr 2020     Views:1781
Business Laws in India...
15 Apr 2020     Views:3372
The Process of Passing an Ordinary Bill in the Par...
14 Apr 2020     Views:12370
International Committee of the Red Cross...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1690
National Company Law Tribunal...
14 Apr 2020     Views:1786
FOOD ADULTERATION...
13 Apr 2020     Views:3237
The United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juv...
13 Apr 2020     Views:4518
Environmental Protection Act, 1986...
12 Apr 2020     Views:2363
IMPORTANCE OF PRECEDENTS ...
12 Apr 2020     Views:10644
MoHFW and ICMR hold a conflicting statement over C...
11 Apr 2020     Views:1498
Introduction to Income Tax Act, 1961...
11 Apr 2020     Views:6288
DEMOCRACY IN INDIA...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2293
United Nations Law of the Sea Convention (UNCLOS)...
10 Apr 2020     Views:2311
An Overview of Juvenile Delinquency and the Juveni...
09 Apr 2020     Views:2633
How is Absolute Liability different from Strict Li...
09 Apr 2020     Views:26011
International Armed Conflict (IAC) and Non-Interna...
09 Apr 2020     Views:4747
The Concept of Bonded Labour under the Legal Syste...
09 Apr 2020     Views:1696
Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?...
08 Apr 2020     Views:33297
What should be given primary importance, Human Rig...
08 Apr 2020     Views:1695
Karl Marx: Debates on the Law on Thefts of Wood ...
08 Apr 2020     Views:6490
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Disc...
07 Apr 2020     Views:1725
Legal Rights of Students in India...
07 Apr 2020     Views:3758
International Covenant on Civil and Political...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1628
Plant Quarantine (Regulation of Import into India)...
06 Apr 2020     Views:2840
The Hart-Fuller debate in a Nutshell ...
06 Apr 2020     Views:19397
Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Cri...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1574
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Child...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1563
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO PRIVACY DURING THE HEALTH CRI...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1474
Traditional Knowledge : The Convention on Biologic...
06 Apr 2020     Views:1841
Bailment...
05 Apr 2020     Views:2217
Monopolistic nature of Copyright Societies in Indi...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1884
Marital Rape...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1421
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Bill ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1376
Manual Scavenging ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1316
How serious can Online Abuse be?...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1390
Cognizable and non cognizable offences...
05 Apr 2020     Views:6962
Legal Aid In India ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1738
Basic Structure Doctrine...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1586
Medical Negligence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1325
Consumer Protection Act, 2019...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1610
Legality of Cryptocurrency in India...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1825
Intimate Partner Violence...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1469
CENTRE USES THE PRETENCE OF ‘FAKE NEWS’ TO SUP...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1326
International Humanitarian Law...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1383
What rights do a disabled person in India have? ...
05 Apr 2020     Views:1756
Universal Declaration of Human Rights...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1671
What is the National Security Act being slapped on...
03 Apr 2020     Views:1376
False News- another epidemic?...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1520
Commercial laws in India a Bird's-eye view...
02 Apr 2020     Views:8917
All About Suo Moto Proceedings...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1798
Intellectual Property Rights...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1506
Alternate Dispute Resolution...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1485
Types of E-commerce Models ...
02 Apr 2020     Views:1479
'Intermeddler' as a Legal Representative under the...
01 Apr 2020     Views:9823
Right to health- A fundamental right...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1541
What is a Green Bond? ...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1432
Defamation...
31 Mar 2020     Views:1403
CONSTITUTIONALITY OF NATIONAL LOCKDOWN...
30 Mar 2020     Views:1603
Positive and Negative Impacts of the US-China Trad...
29 Mar 2020     Views:3251
Public Heath(Covid-19) Rules, 2020...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1325
Opinion | Migration and the Mockery of Lockdown- I...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1360
Female Genital Mutilation- Violation of Human Righ...
29 Mar 2020     Views:1713
Supreme Court’s judgement on Shreya Singhal v. U...
29 Mar 2020     Views:2402
International Court of Justice...
28 Mar 2020     Views:1769
Feminist Jurisprudence...
27 Mar 2020     Views:1911
IP Protection and Diffusion of Environmentally Sou...
27 Mar 2020     Views:2051
Covid-19 fostered Racism ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1483
Mercy Petition: The Process ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2696
WTO Work Programme on E-Commerce ...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1585
Comparison between Section 144 of CrPC, lockdown a...
26 Mar 2020     Views:2114
Prison reforms...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1425
How far has the LGBTQI community come?...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1660
Public Interest Litigation...
26 Mar 2020     Views:1673
The Right to information Act- Still a right or not...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1671
Legalization of Marijuana...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1523
Significance of AB PM-JAY in the light of COVID-19...
25 Mar 2020     Views:1401
The History of Magna Carta...
25 Mar 2020     Views:2664
Introduction to Child Rights in India...
25 Mar 2020     Views:6112
CENTRE CANNOT DECLARE AN ORGANISATION POLITICAL: ...
06 Mar 2020     Views:3914
A DECISION MADE BY SC ON AYODHYA VERDICT...
29 Jan 2020     Views:1879
RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER IN INDIA...
29 Jan 2020     Views:2107
MARITAL RAPE - A NON CRIMINALIZED CRIME IN INDIA...
24 Jan 2020     Views:2137
MISCONCEPTION ABOUT CITIZENSHIP AMENDMENT ACT ...
22 Jan 2020     Views:2053
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE...
21 Jan 2020     Views:2128
Hyderabad Encounter- Human Rights Violation or Jus...
18 Jan 2020     Views:2639
NOTE ON NIRBHAY CASE CONVICTS...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2048
NOTE ON ARTICLE 370...
17 Jan 2020     Views:2000
Rape and Indian laws ...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2631
An overview on Drugs Law...
13 Jan 2020     Views:2204
Mob Lynching: Role of Politics and approach of Jud...
08 Jan 2020     Views:5057
Trademarks: Spectrum of Distinctiveness and Indian...
06 Jan 2020     Views:5824
Women Prisoners ...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2224
Child Care Institutions and its Judicial Interpret...
23 Dec 2019     Views:2321
Smart Contracts and Their Relevance in The Legal P...
19 Dec 2019     Views:1958
Government Vs Opposition on the Citizenship Amendm...
12 Dec 2019     Views:2273
Condition Of Lady Advocates Vulnerable: Lawyer App...
11 Dec 2019     Views:2789
Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: Ho...
10 Dec 2019     Views:35347
JUDICIAL REVIEW AND JUDICIAL OVER-REACH: TRANSITIO...
10 Dec 2019     Views:4097
Due Process Of Law For Rapists Must Speed Up Now...
10 Dec 2019     Views:1897
Human Rights Of Women Must Also Be Respected...
09 Dec 2019     Views:1917
Speedy Capital Punishment For Rapists Must Be Ensu...
08 Dec 2019     Views:1974
Why Only One Dhananjoy Chatterjee Hanged Till Now?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:2552
Why No Death Penalty For Gang Rape In India?...
07 Dec 2019     Views:1660
Rape Convicts Must Be Hanged At The Earliest From ...
05 Dec 2019     Views:1682
No Mercy Petition And No Life Term Ever For Gang R...
02 Dec 2019     Views:1987
Section 207 CrPC: Magistrate Cannot Withhold Any D...
02 Dec 2019     Views:3369
UP Bar Council Chairman Harishankar Singh Openly C...
17 Nov 2019     Views:2236
AN UNDERSTANDING OF PRESIDENT’S RULE UNDER ART 3...
13 Nov 2019     Views:4010
COOKING UP A LEGALLY PROTECTED MEAL: A study on IP...
13 Nov 2019     Views:2052
Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde To Be The New CJI From...
31 Oct 2019     Views:2313
UK Supreme Court Declares Prorogation Of Parliamen...
29 Sep 2019     Views:1746
Right To Access Internet Is Part Of Right To Priva...
23 Sep 2019     Views:1770
No Attempt Made To Frame Uniform Civil Code Despit...
19 Sep 2019     Views:1699
A Legal Giant Named Ram Jethmalani Finally Passes ...
09 Sep 2019     Views:1578
Judicial Service – HC Can’t Modify/Relax Instr...
02 Sep 2019     Views:1367
Government Notifies Strict Provisions Of Motor Veh...
31 Aug 2019     Views:1484
NDPS: Reverse Burden Of Proof Does Not Absolve Pro...
30 Aug 2019     Views:2345
Institutional Independence, Financial Autonomy Int...
28 Aug 2019     Views:1409
A Legal Luminary And A Political Stalwart Passes A...
25 Aug 2019     Views:1644
Allahabad HC Bans DJs And Passes Directions For Re...
24 Aug 2019     Views:1386
Delhi HC Refuses Anticipatory Bail To P Chidambara...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1596
Chidambaram Getting No Respite From Courts...
23 Aug 2019     Views:1324
Domestic Violence And Dowry Accused Set Free By Th...
22 Aug 2019     Views:4693
Bombsy HC: Treat every citizen with dignity...
20 Aug 2019     Views:4879
Integration Of J&K With India Is Now Full And Fina...
20 Aug 2019     Views:2411
Second Appeal Not To Be Dismissed Merely On The Gr...
18 Aug 2019     Views:1495
Judge Can Recuse From A Case At His Own Volition, ...
17 Aug 2019     Views:1587
Don't politicize demolition of temples: SC...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4949
Madras Christian College - female students sexuall...
16 Aug 2019     Views:4563
Charged for employing triple talaq...
16 Aug 2019     Views:2316
Earlier Convicted now Acquitted - Lack of Conclusi...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2264
MACAD Scheme to be enforced in Tamil Nadu - 1st Oc...
15 Aug 2019     Views:2184
Filing Of Criminal Complaint For Settling Civil Di...
15 Aug 2019     Views:1627
End Discrimination: Equalize legal age of Marriage...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1475
Madras HC issues directions upon Officers to check...
14 Aug 2019     Views:2005
BOMBAY HC to Civic Bodies: "Own up to your respons...
14 Aug 2019     Views:1508
Infringement of Registered TM "Vistara" - Threat t...
13 Aug 2019     Views:2062
US Citizen approaches Bombay High Court After Bein...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1697
Normalcy need not be restored in J&K instantly : S...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1606
Prohibitory Steps taken against Students for Consu...
13 Aug 2019     Views:1600
Basic Amenities to Traffic Personnel ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1440
Madras HC upholds the appointment notification of ...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1529
Plea against E-pharmacies struck down by Bombay HC...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1535
Parliament Rightly Makes Triple Talaq Criminal But...
12 Aug 2019     Views:1510
No Tax Deduction from Motor Accident Compensation ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1622
Delhi HC: Plant 50 Trees, Quash Criminal Proceedin...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1465
Iyal Isai Nataka Mandram should abide by the time ...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1707
Transitory Committee to be formed for Indian Arche...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1494
Outlawing Of Triple Talaq Is Highly Commendable...
11 Aug 2019     Views:1475
Daring Resolve Taken By Centre On Jammu And Kashmi...
10 Aug 2019     Views:1415
M Kavitha’s suspension to be reviewed...
09 Aug 2019     Views:2135
SC: Adverse Possession owing to Title over Propert...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1565
Regulation of Online streaming contents out of the...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1492
Constitution Cannot Be Above Country Come What May...
09 Aug 2019     Views:1512
Ocean waves to be our new energy source...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1910
Delhi HC: Simple language to be incorporated in FI...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1825
THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ASKED THE GOVERNMENT T...
08 Aug 2019     Views:1365
Victim Has A Right To Assist The Court In A Trial ...
08 Aug 2019     Views:2966
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1770
SC Denies Permission to Conduct DNA Tests...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1675
Whatsapp's fight against interference with User-Pr...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1492
Evidence Of A Solitary Witness In A Criminal Trial...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1541
High Court of Karnataka set aside the retirement o...
07 Aug 2019     Views:1727
Study of Lakes to be Conducted by NEERI...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1645
History-sheeter kidnaps and rapes a College Studen...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1703
No Room For Sympathy While Sentencing Terror Convi...
06 Aug 2019     Views:1662
Rejected Plea: Declaration of Vande Mataram as Nat...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1899
Madras HC corrects the computation error of Motor ...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1475
Fundamental Right To Privacy Not Absolute And Must...
05 Aug 2019     Views:1690
Diocese of Tanjore Society School gets relief from...
04 Aug 2019     Views:1675
THE TEMPLES IN KARNATAKA NO MORE BE GOVERNED UNDER...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1753
Triple Talaq legislation is challenged in the Delh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1467
Special Olympics International Football Championsh...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1385
Concession to be given to disabled persons appeari...
03 Aug 2019     Views:2037
Bombay High Court Hears Dowry Case Involving A Civ...
03 Aug 2019     Views:1783
Karnataka High Court on the condition of Roads...
02 Aug 2019     Views:2033
SC ORDERS DEATH PENALTY IN COIMBATORE GANG-RAPE CA...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1579
RBI Changes Features Of New Currency Notes. Bombay...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1429
Interest Of Victim And Society At Large Must Also ...
02 Aug 2019     Views:1465
Abolition of Colonial Decorum in Courts...
01 Aug 2019     Views:5724
Punjab & Haryana HC Bans Use Of Loudspeakers Witho...
31 Jul 2019     Views:2270
ICJ Has Rightly Called Pakistan’s Bluff In Jadha...
26 Jul 2019     Views:1488
Review And Reconsider Conviction And Sentencing Of...
22 Jul 2019     Views:1529
Plaintiff Cannot Be Forced To Add Parties Against ...
21 Jul 2019     Views:1720
Biggest Slap By ICJ Directly Right On The Face Of ...
19 Jul 2019     Views:1444
Delhi HC Imposes Rs. 50,000 Cost On Woman For Fals...
17 Jul 2019     Views:1473
Non-Appointment Of Judges Affects Speedy Justice: ...
16 Jul 2019     Views:1397
Right To Get Anticipatory Bail Is Not Any Fundamen...
14 Jul 2019     Views:1760
Plea For Anticipatory Bail Not Maintainable Before...
13 Jul 2019     Views:1922
Divorce Cannot Be Granted Only On Ground Of Irretr...
11 Jul 2019     Views:1424
Right To Shelter A Fundamental Right; State Has Co...
08 Jul 2019     Views:1518
HC Cannot Reverse Acquittal Without Affording Oppo...
06 Jul 2019     Views:1295
Centre Is Legally Empowered To Create A High Court...
05 Jul 2019     Views:1992
Centre Must Now Immediately Order Creation Of HC B...
03 Jul 2019     Views:1363
UAPA: SC Dismisses PFI Leader’s Plea Seeking Dis...
02 Jul 2019     Views:1553
How To Record The Evidence Of Deaf And Dumb Rape V...
01 Jul 2019     Views:2391
Ban Advocates From Carrying Weapons Inside Court P...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2695
Enact Strict Law To Ensure Personal Safety Of Doct...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2694
Mere Aggressive Behaviour Of Wife Not A Ground Of ...
26 Jun 2019     Views:2824
Court Cannot Destroy Faith & Beliefs Of People: Ma...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1331
Insult Of Soldier In Name Of Law Is Most Disgracef...
07 Jun 2019     Views:1644
Courts Cannot Decide Eligibility And Essential Qua...
20 May 2019     Views:4829
SC Upholds Constitutionality Of Section 23 Of PCPN...
20 May 2019     Views:2694
My Unflinching Faith In CJI Stands Fully Vindicate...
20 May 2019     Views:1852
Solitary Confinement Of Death Convict Prior To Rej...
20 May 2019     Views:2188
Section 498A & 306 IPC: Incidents Which Happened M...
20 May 2019     Views:5685
Why Should UP Have Least High Court Benches In Ind...
20 May 2019     Views:1626
Successive Bail Applications Should Be Placed Befo...
20 May 2019     Views:8908
“Drop This Episode From Your Minds And Gossips�...
20 May 2019     Views:1500
Is The Criticism Of In-House Procedure Justified?...
20 May 2019     Views:1712
Mere Pendency Of Civil Case Between Complainant An...
20 May 2019     Views:1426
Section 482 CrPC: HC Should Assign Reasons As To W...
20 May 2019     Views:3172
Delhi High Court Directs Government To Set Up 18 F...
20 May 2019     Views:1512
No New Appointments To Be Made From In-Service Can...
18 May 2019     Views:1365
Only Advocates Can Plead And Argue On Behalf Of Li...
09 Apr 2019     Views:3490
Nations Must Make Gun Laws More Stricter...
04 Apr 2019     Views:4288
SC Designates 37 Lawyers As Senior Advocates...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6802
Adding Additional Accused: To Invoke Section 319 C...
04 Apr 2019     Views:6520
SC Sets Aside Life Ban Imposed On Cricketer Sreesa...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1772
P&H HC Directs Protection Of Honest Officers While...
04 Apr 2019     Views:1562
Death Sentence Can Be Imposed Only When Life Impri...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2109
Islamabad High Court Rejects Plea Against Release ...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2276
Lawyers Resort To Seek Unnecessary Adjournments Am...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2358
Even Poem Can Help Save A Death Convict From Gallo...
19 Mar 2019     Views:2398
Educated Woman Supposed To Be Fully Aware Of Conse...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1411
Jammu and Kashmir HC Upholds PM’s Employment Pac...
19 Mar 2019     Views:1854
Magistrate Shall Specify Whether Sentences Awarded...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2561
Mere Inability To Repay Loan Does Not Constitute C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3077
Inability To Establish Motive In A Case Of Circums...
23 Feb 2019     Views:2823
Punjab & Haryana HC Issues Slew Of Directions To C...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3117
Court Has to Confine Itself To The Four Corners Of...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1558
Long Pendency Amounts To A Special Reason For Impo...
23 Feb 2019     Views:1621
Successive Applications For Recalling Witnesses Sh...
23 Feb 2019     Views:3170
Lieutenant General (Rtd) Cannot Be Tried In A Gene...
06 Feb 2019     Views:2481
Autonomy Of the Bar Cannot Be Taken Over By The Co...
05 Feb 2019     Views:3182
Casual Act Of Possession Over Property Does Not Co...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2423
No Authority Can Claim Privilege Not To Comply Wit...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2661
Death Sentence Only When The Alternative Option Is...
04 Feb 2019     Views:2749
SC Imposes Rs 5 Crore Penalty On A Medical College...
28 Jan 2019     Views:2024
A Judicial Officer Is Not An Ordinary Government S...
25 Jan 2019     Views:2149
Rape And Murder Of 8 Year Old Girl: SC Commutes De...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2189
Mere Allegations Of Harassment Without Proximate P...
23 Jan 2019     Views:2812
Legal Article Why Should They Speak Lies: Decease...
23 Jan 2019     Views:1705
Can a Economic offender can escape by surrendering...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1579
NCW is a Lame Duck or Legal Guardian for women...
22 Jan 2019     Views:1477
Mutual Consent Divorce Procedure in Chennai Family...
21 Jan 2019     Views:6625
Quick Divorce in India...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1614
4 Important things to file Divorce in Chennai...
21 Jan 2019     Views:1782
How to get Divorce for Muslim Men ...
21 Jan 2019     Views:12013
Offences Under Section 307 IPC Can’t Be Quashed ...
17 Jan 2019     Views:3723
Suspicion, Howsoever Grave, Can’t Substitute Pro...
17 Jan 2019     Views:1562
Delhi HC Rejects AJL's Plea Against Centre's Order...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2554
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots: Delhi HC Awards Life Term To...
03 Jan 2019     Views:2244
SC Dismisses Petitions Seeking Probe Into Rafale D...
20 Dec 2018     Views:2650
Executive Magistrate Cannot Direct Police To Regis...
20 Dec 2018     Views:3215
Why Lawyers Of West UP Are Compelled To Strike Fre...
20 Dec 2018     Views:1813
recheck...
19 Dec 2018     Views:2370
1984 Anti-Sikh Riots – Delhi HC Upholds Convicti...
12 Dec 2018     Views:1973
Why Lawless West UP Has No High Court Bench?...
11 Dec 2018     Views:2269
Bombay HC Quashes Government Resolution Making It ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2390
SLP Against Death Sentence Shall Not Be Dismissed ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2450
SC Allows Live-Streaming Of Public Proceedings In ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:2306
Sexual Offenders Registry For Law Enforcement Agen...
26 Nov 2018     Views:4273
Delhi HC Sentences 16 Policemen To Life Imprisonme...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1572
Men Too Have Right Not To Be Defamed And Denounced...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1694
Courts Have To Adequately Consider Defence Of The ...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1548
CJI Ranjan Gogoi Demonstrates His Firm Resolve And...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1479
SC Issues Directions On Examination Of Witnesses I...
26 Nov 2018     Views:3067
Aadhaar Held Mandatory For Government Subsidies An...
26 Nov 2018     Views:1918
Legal Article Now Bar Council ID Card Is Valid Id...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2676
SC Sets Deadline On Sale Of BS-IV Vehicles; Says H...
01 Nov 2018     Views:2499
Devotion Cannot Be Subjected To Gender Discriminat...
23 Oct 2018     Views:3791
There Cannot Be Any Mechanical Denial Of Appointme...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2833
Rights Of Accused Far Outweigh That Of Victims, Ne...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1717
SC Strikes Down 158 Year Old Adultery Law Under Se...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2746
Extra-Judicial Confession Of Accused Need Not In A...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1954
Leaders Of Outfits Calling For Mob Violence Liable...
23 Oct 2018     Views:1726
Section 377 IPC Decriminalised Partially By Supre...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2229
New CJI Ranjan Gogoi Is Determined To Ensure Sweep...
23 Oct 2018     Views:2105
Court Must Not Go Deep Into The Matter While Consi...
26 Sep 2018     Views:2414
Reputation Of An Individual Is An Insegregable Fac...
26 Sep 2018     Views:3199
Sec. 498A IPC: Only HC Can Quash Cases On Settleme...
18 Sep 2018     Views:4122
Punjab & Haryana HC Orders Rape Convict, Mother To...
17 Sep 2018     Views:2484
Bombay HC Imposes Cost Of Rs 50K On Petitioner Fir...
17 Sep 2018     Views:1758
Uttarakhand HC Dismisses “Contempt Petition” A...
14 Sep 2018     Views:1825
SC Stresses On Need To Develop And Recognize ‘De...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1765
Mirchpur Dalit Killings: “Atrocities Against SCs...
08 Sep 2018     Views:1913
SC Upholds Pan India Reservation Rule in Delhi; Bu...
03 Sep 2018     Views:2224
NDPS Bail Conditions Discriminatory, Irrational An...
31 Aug 2018     Views:3080
People Without A Degree Performing Surgeries: Utta...
28 Aug 2018     Views:1835
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions For Conserving �...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2318
12 Year Old Girl’s Rape And Murder: Constitute P...
28 Aug 2018     Views:2079
MP HC To Debar Members/Office Bearers Of Bar Counc...
22 Aug 2018     Views:1779
Special Squad, Police Patrolling Every 24 Hours To...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1916
NRC Being Prepared Under Supreme Court’s Watch I...
20 Aug 2018     Views:1923
Victims Of Crime Can Seek Cancellation Of Bail: MP...
20 Aug 2018     Views:2081
Delhi HC Strikes Down Provisions In Law That Crimi...
13 Aug 2018     Views:2134
Delhi HC Quashes Govt Notification Revising Minimu...
09 Aug 2018     Views:2086
Poorest Of Poor Cannot Go To Private Hospitals: Ut...
07 Aug 2018     Views:2406
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Just Keep Strikin...
04 Aug 2018     Views:2363
Courts Must See That The Public Doesn’t Lose Con...
04 Aug 2018     Views:1874
UK Tier 1 Entrepreneur Visa: Overview from Experts...
31 Jul 2018     Views:1964
Enact Law For Safety Of Soldiers Of Jammu And Kash...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1834
SC Advocates Creating A Special Law Against Lynchi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3205
Matrimonial Discord Can’t Be Considered As Reaso...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3202
Uttarakhand HC Recommends Govt To Enact Legislatio...
23 Jul 2018     Views:3043
High Court Priests Cannot Refuse To Perform Religi...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2315
Uttarakhand High Court Passes String Of Directions...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1656
SC Finally Decides Master Of Roster Case...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1609
Stone Pelters And Terrorists Have No Right To Life...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2149
Remove Designations Like Police, HC, Journalist, A...
23 Jul 2018     Views:2114
Why Centre is Providing Security For Separatists B...
23 Jul 2018     Views:1900
Farmer Suicide Due To Bankruptcy Or Indebtedness: ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:4680
Every Indian Should Salute Brave Soldier Aurangzeb...
05 Jul 2018     Views:3303
Uttarakhand HC Issues Directions To Curb Drug Pedd...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2624
Have A Functional National Law University Within 3...
05 Jul 2018     Views:2224
Establish Regional Bench Of AFT In The State Withi...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1624
Cancel Licences of Drivers Using Cell Phones; Helm...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1512
Uttarakhand High Court Puts Restrictions On Noise ...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1676
Supreme Court To Look Into Validity Of Amended Law...
05 Jul 2018     Views:1499
Mysterious Deaths, Rapes, Malnutrition, Unsanitary...
29 Jun 2018     Views:2669
No Politics Please Over Plan To Assassinate PM Mod...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2073
Free Mentally Ill Children And Formulate Policies ...
11 Jun 2018     Views:2510
Landmark Ruling By Uttarakhand HC On Solitary Conf...
07 Jun 2018     Views:3099
Right Of Adult Couple To Live Together Without Mar...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2195
Why BJP Will Be Wiped Out In West UP And UP?...
06 Jun 2018     Views:2280
Why UP Has Just One High Court Bench And West UP N...
05 Jun 2018     Views:1808
Women Governed By Muslim Personal Law Can Invoke P...
04 Jun 2018     Views:1554
Why Is BJP Not Creating More Benches In UP?...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1717
Probation Period To Count For New Civil Servants B...
01 Jun 2018     Views:3489
SC Women Lawyers Association Seeks Chemical Castra...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1542
SC Finally Steps In To Expedite POCSO Cases...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2962
UP Former CMs Can’t Stay In Govt Bungalows: SC...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1491
Make BCCI A Public Body: Law Panel...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1835
Self-Styled Godman Asaram Awarded Life Until Death...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1732
Why Cases Withdrawn Against Stone Pelters In Kashm...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1892
A High Court Bench For West UP In Meerut Is Impera...
01 Jun 2018     Views:2081
People Of Karnataka Should Worship Congress...
01 Jun 2018     Views:1913
Delhi HC Upholds Life Term To Seven Policemen...
19 Mar 2018     Views:1626
Finance Act-2018 And Customs Act-1962 (Amendments)...
28 Feb 2018     Views:1750
Why No Death Or Life Term For Corruption?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1543
Will Electoral Bonds Usher In Transparency?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1504
How Long Will Lawyers Of West UP Keep Striking?...
19 Feb 2018     Views:1620
Finance Act 2018 and Customs Act 1962...
18 Feb 2018     Views:2089
Why Has Stone Pelting Been Legalised In Kashmir?...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1659
Shopian Firing: Major's Dad Moving SC For Quashing...
12 Feb 2018     Views:1572
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Kill Stone Pelt...
12 Feb 2018     Views:2951
Attack On Lawyers: Delhi HC Issues Notice To Delhi...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1546
Female Foeticide Must Be Punished Most Strictly...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1810
Soldiers Have Every Legal Right To Act In Self Def...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1549
New Consumer Protection Bill 2018 Will Entail More...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1579
CJI Brings Out A Roster To Allot Cases...
10 Feb 2018     Views:2117
Five Year Jail Term For Lalu In Third Fodder Scam ...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1645
SC Quashes All The 88 Mining Leases In Goa...
10 Feb 2018     Views:1687
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 (PMLA-20...
07 Feb 2018     Views:1695
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 Amended ...
04 Feb 2018     Views:2204
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act -2002 --U/S 45(...
03 Feb 2018     Views:2051
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 (P...
16 Jan 2018     Views:1745
humanity...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1510
Prevention Of Money Laundering Act-2002 PMLA...
13 Jan 2018     Views:1539
Right to Know...
05 Jan 2018     Views:2008
A STUDY OF CERTAIN DEDUCTIONS ON INCOME TAX RELATI...
29 Dec 2017     Views:2186
Enviornment protection is for saving universe...
28 Dec 2017     Views:1509
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND STATUS OF SECTION 377, IPC, 1...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1781
PROBLEMS WITHIN THE EXISTING POLICE SYSTEM...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1602
LEGALITY : LEGALITY OF MARITAL RAPE...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2531
RIGHT TO PRIVACY AND DIRECTION FOR MANDATORY AADHA...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1720
THE PARADOX OF PLEA BARGAINING...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2513
JOURNEY OF EVMs AMIDST CONTROVERSIES ...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1621
UIDAI suspends Airtel, Airtel Payments and Banks e...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2113
2G Scam : The 2G Scam and much more...
26 Dec 2017     Views:2351
Kerala teen surveillance case: Invasion of Privacy...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1784
Motherhood or Employment- the judicial perspective...
26 Dec 2017     Views:1810
Prev1...2345678...9Next

Most Read Articles

  • Once a mortgage, always a mortgage
    On 23 Apr 2020    Views:56022
  • Relationship between International Law and Municipal Law
    On 18 Apr 2020    Views:54724
  • Montesquieu’s Theory of Separation of Powers: How it has been adopted in India
    On 10 Dec 2019    Views:35347
  • Why Indian Constitution is called Quasi-federal?
    On 08 Apr 2020    Views:33297
  • VETO POWER AND DOUBLE VETO POWER
    On 20 Apr 2020    Views:30766
View all >>

Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified Propertified

86540

Lawyers Network

103860

Users

630

Cities Serving

114

Law Schools Network

59824

Law Students Network

About us

  • Company Profile

Indian Major Laws

  • Indian Constitution
  • IPC
  • CrPC
  • CPC
  • Companies Act
  • Indian Evidence Act
  • CGST Act
  • Limitation Act

Policies

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Refund & Cancellation

    Ads & Media

  • Resource Sharing
  • Advertiser(Sign Up/Login)
  • Media

    Careers

  • Internships
  • Jobs
  • Student Journalists

    HELP & SUPPORT

  • Contact Us
  • Grievances
  • Test

News

  • Legal News
  • Post Article
  • Post Interview

Legal Library

  • Central Acts
  • Deeds Drafts [1128 ]
  • Legal Maxims

Connect

Lawsisto Direct

 

  •  
  •  
DISCLAIMER
Copyright © Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved.
Unless otherwise indicated, all materials on these pages are copyrighted by Lawsisto Private Limited. All rights reserved. No part of these pages, either text or image may
be used for any purpose. By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies.